Tue, Oct 21, 2025
Volume 13, Issue 2 (7-2024)
2024, 13(2): 1-7 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Dehghan S, Donyavi Z, Ranjpour N, Fathollahi N. Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris in maxillary premolars Using Neoniti A1, Reciproc and Only One File: An in vitro study. Journal title 2024; 13 (2) :1-7
URL: http://3dj.gums.ac.ir/article-1-595-en.html
URL: http://3dj.gums.ac.ir/article-1-595-en.html
1- Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran. , s.dehghan.b@gmail.com
2- Department of Endodontics, Clinical Research Development Unit, School of Dentistry, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
3- Clinical Research Development Unit, School of Dentistry, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
4- Student Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
2- Department of Endodontics, Clinical Research Development Unit, School of Dentistry, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
3- Clinical Research Development Unit, School of Dentistry, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
4- Student Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Abstract: (571 Views)
Introduction: Apical extrusion of debris has been associated with postoperative pain, flare-up and delayed periapical healing. Studies reported that reciprocating instrumentation was associated with more debris extrusion than rotary instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to compare the amount of apically extruded debris using single-file rotary and reciprocating instrumentation systems.
Materials and Methods: Sixty human maxillary premolar teeth were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 20): Reciproc R25 (VDW, 25, 0.08), Neoniti A1 (NEOLIX, 25, 0.08), Only One File (Denco, 25, 0.08). Canal instrumentation was done according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Measurements of debris were measured by Montgomery method. Brown-Forsythe test, robust and Games-Howell post hoc test were used for data analysis (α=0.05).
Results: The results of this study showed that the highest amount of debris extruded is in the Reciproc file and the lowest is in Neoniti A1. There was a significant difference between the means of the three groups (P˂0.05). Games-Howell post-hoc test was showed that there is a significant difference in pair by pair comparison of groups (P˂0.05).
Conclusion: Based on this in vitro study, all systems have some apical debris extrusion; however, it seems that rotary single-file instrumentation system was better than reciprocating single-file instrumentation systems in terms of the amount of debris extrusion.
Materials and Methods: Sixty human maxillary premolar teeth were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 20): Reciproc R25 (VDW, 25, 0.08), Neoniti A1 (NEOLIX, 25, 0.08), Only One File (Denco, 25, 0.08). Canal instrumentation was done according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Measurements of debris were measured by Montgomery method. Brown-Forsythe test, robust and Games-Howell post hoc test were used for data analysis (α=0.05).
Results: The results of this study showed that the highest amount of debris extruded is in the Reciproc file and the lowest is in Neoniti A1. There was a significant difference between the means of the three groups (P˂0.05). Games-Howell post-hoc test was showed that there is a significant difference in pair by pair comparison of groups (P˂0.05).
Conclusion: Based on this in vitro study, all systems have some apical debris extrusion; however, it seems that rotary single-file instrumentation system was better than reciprocating single-file instrumentation systems in terms of the amount of debris extrusion.
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
So on
Received: 2024/06/16 | Accepted: 2024/08/28 | Published: 2024/11/20
Received: 2024/06/16 | Accepted: 2024/08/28 | Published: 2024/11/20
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Articles Copyright © The Author(s).
Owned by Guilan University of Medical Sciences.
Co-published by Zamen Salamati.
Contact Information
The end of professor Samii Blv, Guilan University of Medical Sciences Complex, Dental School, Rasht, Iran.
Journal Tel : +9813 33486428
Publisher Tel : +9821 86037228 , 86036497
Email: den3djournal@gums.ac.ir
