Wed, Apr 24, 2024
Volume 8, Issue 4 (11-2019)
2019, 8(4): 32-37 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hosseini S H, Motevasseli S, Yektan Sani K, Maleki D. Research Paper: clinical and radiographic methods of marginal bone loss evaluation after immediate implantation in post-extraction sockets. Journal title 2019; 8 (4) :32-37
URL: http://3dj.gums.ac.ir/article-1-494-en.html
URL: http://3dj.gums.ac.ir/article-1-494-en.html
1- Assistant professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
2- Dentist
3- Dental Student, Student Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
2- Dentist
3- Dental Student, Student Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
Abstract: (790 Views)
Abstract
Introduction: To achieve the best esthetic and functional results of implantation and patient satisfaction, different protocols of implant therapy have been
recommended. Immediate implantation can provide the outcome faster than other protocols making it the treatment of choice. The rate of peri-implant bone resorption should be measured clinically and radiographically as bone support is a key factor in success of implant.
Materials and Methods:24 patients suitable for immediate implantation were selected. After atraumatic tooth extraction, the implant was placed and
alveoloplasty was performed to reduce the implant-bone gap. A panoramic radiography was prepared 10 days after surgery and 3 months later on the day of healing cap insertion. The marginal bone loss was measured by subtractive technique. The clinical
evaluation was done in same appointment by caliper. The software used for statistical analysis was SPSS 24.
Results: The rate of bone resorption in radiographic evaluation was 0 to 0.30 mm whereas bone resorption was clinically reported at 0 -1 mm. Finally, the Paired T test showed no statistically significant difference (P = 0.296), but there was a positive and significant correlation (P = 0.026, R = 0.453), also the success rate in the evaluation of the results of the implant surgery was 100%.
Conclusion:Based on the findings of this study, both methods for measuring bone analysis after
implantation were acceptable and had a significant correlation. Therefore, the use of the less invasive method of radiological evaluation is recommended as a two-stage panoramic method.
Introduction: To achieve the best esthetic and functional results of implantation and patient satisfaction, different protocols of implant therapy have been
recommended. Immediate implantation can provide the outcome faster than other protocols making it the treatment of choice. The rate of peri-implant bone resorption should be measured clinically and radiographically as bone support is a key factor in success of implant.
Materials and Methods:24 patients suitable for immediate implantation were selected. After atraumatic tooth extraction, the implant was placed and
alveoloplasty was performed to reduce the implant-bone gap. A panoramic radiography was prepared 10 days after surgery and 3 months later on the day of healing cap insertion. The marginal bone loss was measured by subtractive technique. The clinical
evaluation was done in same appointment by caliper. The software used for statistical analysis was SPSS 24.
Results: The rate of bone resorption in radiographic evaluation was 0 to 0.30 mm whereas bone resorption was clinically reported at 0 -1 mm. Finally, the Paired T test showed no statistically significant difference (P = 0.296), but there was a positive and significant correlation (P = 0.026, R = 0.453), also the success rate in the evaluation of the results of the implant surgery was 100%.
Conclusion:Based on the findings of this study, both methods for measuring bone analysis after
implantation were acceptable and had a significant correlation. Therefore, the use of the less invasive method of radiological evaluation is recommended as a two-stage panoramic method.
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
General
Received: 2019/11/15 | Accepted: 2019/11/25 | Published: 2019/11/25
Received: 2019/11/15 | Accepted: 2019/11/25 | Published: 2019/11/25
| Rights and permissions | |
 | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Articles Copyright © The Author(s).
Owned by Guilan University of Medical Sciences.
Co-published by Negah Institute for Scientific Communication.
Contact Information
The end of professor Samii Blv, Guilan University of Medical Sciences Complex, Dental School, Rasht, Iran.
Journal Tel : +9813 33486428
Publisher Tel : +9821 86037228 , 86036497
Email: den3djournal@gums.ac.ir
