Volume 6, Issue 3 (10-2017)                   3dj 2017, 6(3): 61-68 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Pourmonajemzadeh S, Teymori P, Badianat S, Hashemipour M A. Systematic Evaluation of Effect of Myrtle and Fenugreek on Initial Inflammatory Response of Lingual Muscles to Different Types of Suturing Material in Diabetic Rats. 3dj 2017; 6 (3) :61-68
URL: http://3dj.gums.ac.ir/article-1-281-en.html
1- DDS, Dentist, Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
2- DDS, Dentist, Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
3- MSc., Oral and Dental Diseases Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Abstract:   (3540 Views)
Introduction: Several studies have been conducted to examine the effect of suture material on the skin during healing of the wound while a few articles reviewed the musculoskeletal response. In this study, the effects of the two plants, myrtle and fenugreek, on the primary inflammatory response of the tongue muscles to the types of suture in diabetic rats are examined.
Materials and Methods: For conducting this study, 96 Wistar healthy male white rats weighing between 250 and 300 g were selected. The animals were divided into 3 groups, 32 each, consisting of the diabetic group, the diabetic-myrtle group, and the diabetic-fenugreek group. All the animals became diabetic two weeks before the study using Streptozotocin (STZ). For carrying out the task, all animals were anesthetized on the first day using ketamine with a dosage of 60 mg/kg and xylazine (Rampon) with a dosage of 5.7 mg/kg. Four wounds were made using No. 15 blade, and each wound was sutured using one sample of suture string (simple interrupted suture). Then, in the myrtle and fenugreek groups, these materials were placed on the sutures using swabs. After this, from each group, 8 animals were sacrificed using ether. On days 2, 4, 7 and 14, samples were taken from the suture sites with intact margins and were sent to the pathological lab, and the degree of inflammation was examined using a light microscope with magnifications of 40 and 100. At last, the data were analyzed using Wilcoxon, post hoc ( by SPSS version 13.5).
Results: This study showed that the least amount of inflammation on all days was associated with silk string followed by plain catgut in the diabetic group, and there was a significant relationship (P=0.001) in that regard with the two other suture strings used; chromic catgut and monofilament polyamide. In the myrtle group, chromic catgut and monofilament polyamide inflammation were not significantly different as compared with the other two suture strings in the control group on all days of the study. The findings showed that in the fenugreek group and the control silk and monofilament polyamide, the inflammation severity was not significantly different from the two suture strings in the control group on all days of the study.
Conclusion: The findings of this study showed that the two plants myrtle and fenugreek reduce the inflammatory response in plain catgut though the effect of myrtle was more significant. Myrtle is also effective in reducing inflammation in silk while fenugreek is effective in reducing the inflammation caused by chromic catgut.
Full-Text [PDF 1114 kb]   (755 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (981 Views)  
Type of Study: Original article | Subject: So on
Received: 2017/03/16 | Accepted: 2017/07/10 | Published: 2017/10/1

1. Tidball JG. Inflammatory processes in muscle injury and repair. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2005; 288(2):R345–R353. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00454.2004 [DOI:10.1152/ajpregu.00454.2004]
2. Sadove AM, Van Aalst JA, Culp JA. Cleft palate repair: art and issues. Clinics in Plastic Surgery. 2004; 31(2):231–41. doi: 10.1016/s0094-1298(03)00136-6 [DOI:10.1016/S0094-1298(03)00136-6]
3. Durmus M, Karaaslan E, Ozturk E, Gulec M, Iraz M, Edali N, Ersoy MO. The effects of single dose dexamethasone on wound healing in rats. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2003; 97(5):1377-80. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000080611.29106.9e [DOI:10.1213/01.ANE.0000080611.29106.9E]
4. Tidball JG, Wehling-Henricks M. Macrophages promote muscle membrane repair and muscle fibre growth and regeneration during modified muscle loading in micein vivo. The Journal of Physiology. 2006; 578(1):327–36. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.118265 [DOI:10.1113/jphysiol.2006.118265]
5. Yaltirik M, Dedeoglu K, Bilgic B, Koray M, Ersev H, Issever H, et al. Comparison of four different suture materials in soft tissues of rats. Oral Diseases. 2003; 9(6):284–6. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-0825.2003.00954.x [DOI:10.1034/j.1601-0825.2003.00954.x]
6. Hochberg J, Meyer KM, Marion MD. Suture choice and other methods of skin closure. Surgical Clinics of North Americ. 2009; 89(3):627–41. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2009.03.001 [DOI:10.1016/j.suc.2009.03.001]
7. Sharififar F, Derakhshanfar A, Dehghan-Nudeh G, Abbasi N, Abbasi R, Gharaei RR et al. In vivo antioxidant activity of Zataria multiflora Boiss essential oil. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2011; 24(2):221-5. PMID: 21454174 [PMID]
8. Sharififar F, Khazaeli P, Alli N, Talebian E, Zarehshahi R, Amiri S. Study of antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities of certain Iranian medicinal plants. Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology. 2012; 1(1):19-24. doi: 10.5455/jice.20120227104636 [DOI:10.5455/jice.20120227104636]
9. Miguel MG. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of essential oils: A short review. Molecules. 2010; 15(12):9252–87. doi: 10.3390/molecules15129252 [DOI:10.3390/molecules15129252]
10. Sumitra M, Manikandan P, Suguna L. Efficacy of Butea monosperma on dermal wound healing in rats. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2005; 37(3):566–73. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.08.003 [DOI:10.1016/j.biocel.2004.08.003]
11. Romana-Souza B, Nascimento AP, Monte-Alto-Costa A. Propranolol improves cutaneous wound healing in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2009; 611(1-3):77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.03.053 [DOI:10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.03.053]
12. Yilmaz N, Inal S, Muglali M, Guvenc T, Bas B. Effects of polyglecaprone 25, silk and catgut suture materials on oral mucosa wound healing in diabetic rats: an evaluation of nitric oxide dynamics. Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal. 2010; ;15 (3):e526–e30. doi: 10.4317/medoral.15.e526 [DOI:10.4317/medoral.15.e526]
13. Certosimo FJ, Nicoll BK, Nelson RR, Wolfgang M. Wound healing and repair: A review of the art and science. General Dentistry. 1998; 46(4):362-9; quiz 370-1. PMID: 9758982 [PMID]
14. Van 't Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J. Meta analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incision. British Journal of Surgery. 2002; 89(11):1350-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02258.x [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02258.x]
15. Bekele T, Bhokre AP, Tesfaye A. Tissue reactivity and suture handling characteristics of "jimat" against silk and chromic gut in cat thigh muscle: A comparative study. Veterinary World. 2015; 8(8):958–69. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.958-969 [DOI:10.14202/vetworld.2015.958-969]
16. Huaixan LN, Arruda SSB, Leonardo AS, Viana JC, Barreto-Vianna ARC, Ximenes FHB, et al. Macroscopic, histochemical, and immunohistochemical comparison of hysterorrhaphy using catgut and chitosan suture wires. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2015; 104(1):50–7. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33369 [DOI:10.1002/jbm.b.33369]
17. Dunn D. Wound closure manual. Somerville, New Jersey: Ethicon: A Johnson and Johnson Company; 2007.
18. Bhargava D, Anantanarayanan P, Prakash G, Dare B, Deshpande A. Initial inflammatory response of skeletal muscle to commonly used suture materials: An animal model study to evaluate muscle healing after surgical repair - histopathological perspective. Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal. 2013; 18(3):e491–e96. doi: 10.4317/medoral.18608 [DOI:10.4317/medoral.18608]
19. Kim J-S, Shin S-I, Herr Y, Park J-B, Kwon Y-H, Chung J-H. Tissue reactions to suture materials in the oral mucosa of beagle dogs. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science. 2011; 41(4):185-91. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2011.41.4.185 [DOI:10.5051/jpis.2011.41.4.185]
20. Leknes KN, Røynstrand IT, Selvig KA. Human gingival tissue reactions to silk and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures. Journal of Periodontology. 2005; 76(1):34–42. doi: /10.1902/jop.2005.76.1.34
21. Javed F, Al-Askar M, Almas K, Romanos GE, Al-Hezaimi K. Tissue reactions to various suture materials used in oral surgical interventions. ISRN Dentistry. 2012; 2012:1–6. doi: 10.5402/2012/762095 [DOI:10.5402/2012/762095]
22. Silva RT, Barros TF, de Carvalho JT, Ribeiro AA, Pires AF, Wei TH. Comparative study of microanastomosis with distinct 10-0 nylon sutures in rats. Acta Ortopédica Brasileira. 2016;24(1):35-8. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220162401152773 [DOI:10.1590/1413-785220162401152773]
23. Ben Abdessalem S, Debbabi F, Jedda H, Elmarzougui S, Mokhtar S. Tensile and knot performance of polyester braided sutures. Textile Research Journal. 2009; 79(3):247–52. doi: 10.1177/0040517508094090 [DOI:10.1177/0040517508094090]
24. Lilly GE, Armstrong JH, Salem JE, Cutcher JL. Reaction of oral tissues to suture materials. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1968; 26(4):592–9. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(68)90343-5 [DOI:10.1016/0030-4220(68)90343-5]
25. Ghassemi A, Hashemipour MA, Lotfi S, Torabi M. OI0263 Effects of 3 plant species on intraoral ulcers in rats. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2014; 117(5):e359–e60. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.01.113 [DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2014.01.113]
26. Hashemipour MA, Lotfi S, Torabi M, Sharifi F, Ansari M, Ghassemi AR, Sheikhshoaie S. Evaluation of the effects of three plant species (MyrtusCommunis L., Camellia Sinensis L., ZatariaMultifloraBoiss.) on the healing process of intraoral ulcers in rats. Journal of Dentistry (Shiraz). 2017; 18(2):127-35. PMID: 28620637

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Dentomaxillofacial

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb