جلد 11، شماره 1 - ( 11-1400 )
جلد 11 شماره 1 صفحات 32-24 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Tavangar S M, Sadeghi Y, Tayefeh Davalloo R, Darabi F, Atrkar Roushan Z, Dadashi H. The Comparison of Shear Bond
Strength of Self-cured and Light-cured Composite
Restorations to Dentin, Using a Universal Bonding System. Journal title 2022; 11 (1) :24-32
URL: http://3dj.gums.ac.ir/article-1-523-fa.html
URL: http://3dj.gums.ac.ir/article-1-523-fa.html
The Comparison of Shear Bond
Strength of Self-cured and Light-cured Composite
Restorations to Dentin, Using a Universal Bonding System. عنوان نشریه. 1400; 11 (1) :24-32
چکیده: (656 مشاهده)
Introduction: To evaluate and compare shear bond strength of self-cure and
light-cure composites using a universal bonding system.
Materials and Methods: Superficial coronal dentin of 62 intact extracted
premolars was exposed and bonding agent (All-Bond Universal) was applied over the
dentin surface according to the manufacturer instruction (self-etch mode). Then
samples were distributed in 2 groups (n=31), and composite cylinders were built using AELITE All-purpose Body Light-cure composite (group I) and MasterDent Self-cure composite (group II). Samples were kept in distilled water at room temperature for one week and then were thermocycled (500 cycles, 5 º C to 55º C). Finally, samples were mounted in acrylic molds and shear bond strength was assessed using a Universal Testing Machine at the crosshead speed of 0.5 millimeter per minute. Stereomicroscope was used to determine the failure mode. Bond strength data were analyzed using sample t-test and frequencies of failure types analyzed using Chi-square test.
Results: Mean shear bond strength in group I (34 ± 3.56Mpa) was higher than group II (32±3.24Mpa). In addition, the prevalence of adhesive failure in group II (74.2%) was higher than group I (67.7%). However, these differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Our findings showed that the application of All-Bond Universal
followed by a self-cured composite without using a separate self-cure activator on
dentin, provides bond strength values comparable to that of a light-cured composite.
light-cure composites using a universal bonding system.
Materials and Methods: Superficial coronal dentin of 62 intact extracted
premolars was exposed and bonding agent (All-Bond Universal) was applied over the
dentin surface according to the manufacturer instruction (self-etch mode). Then
samples were distributed in 2 groups (n=31), and composite cylinders were built using AELITE All-purpose Body Light-cure composite (group I) and MasterDent Self-cure composite (group II). Samples were kept in distilled water at room temperature for one week and then were thermocycled (500 cycles, 5 º C to 55º C). Finally, samples were mounted in acrylic molds and shear bond strength was assessed using a Universal Testing Machine at the crosshead speed of 0.5 millimeter per minute. Stereomicroscope was used to determine the failure mode. Bond strength data were analyzed using sample t-test and frequencies of failure types analyzed using Chi-square test.
Results: Mean shear bond strength in group I (34 ± 3.56Mpa) was higher than group II (32±3.24Mpa). In addition, the prevalence of adhesive failure in group II (74.2%) was higher than group I (67.7%). However, these differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Our findings showed that the application of All-Bond Universal
followed by a self-cured composite without using a separate self-cure activator on
dentin, provides bond strength values comparable to that of a light-cured composite.
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 | این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
