جلد 8، شماره 4 - ( 9-1398 )                   جلد 8 شماره 4 صفحات 37-32 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hosseini S H, Motevasseli S, Yektan Sani K, Maleki D. Research Paper: clinical and radiographic methods of marginal bone loss evaluation after immediate implantation in post-extraction sockets. Journal title 2019; 8 (4) :32-37
URL: http://3dj.gums.ac.ir/article-1-494-fa.html
Research Paper: clinical and radiographic methods of marginal bone loss evaluation after immediate implantation in post-extraction sockets. عنوان نشریه. 1398; 8 (4) :32-37

URL: http://3dj.gums.ac.ir/article-1-494-fa.html


چکیده:   (781 مشاهده)
Abstract
Introduction: To achieve the best esthetic and functional results of implantation and patient satisfaction, different protocols of implant therapy have been 
recommended. Immediate implantation can provide the outcome faster than other protocols making it the treatment of choice. The rate of peri-implant bone resorption should be measured clinically and radiographically as bone support is a key factor in success of implant.
Materials and Methods:24 patients suitable for immediate implantation were selected. After atraumatic tooth extraction, the implant was placed and 
alveoloplasty was performed to reduce the implant-bone gap. A panoramic radiography was prepared 10 days after surgery and 3 months later on the day of healing cap insertion. The marginal bone loss was measured by subtractive technique. The clinical 
evaluation was done in same appointment by caliper. The software used for statistical analysis was SPSS 24.
Results: The rate of bone resorption in radiographic evaluation was 0 to 0.30 mm whereas bone resorption was clinically reported at 0 -1 mm. Finally, the Paired T test showed no statistically significant difference (P = 0.296), but there was a positive and significant correlation (P = 0.026, R = 0.453), also the success rate in the evaluation of the results of the implant surgery was 100%.
Conclusion:Based on the findings of this study, both methods for measuring bone analysis after
 implantation were acceptable and had a significant correlation. Therefore, the use of the less invasive method of radiological evaluation is recommended as a two-stage panoramic method.
متن کامل [PDF 521 kb]   (180 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: عمومى
دریافت: 1398/8/24 | پذیرش: 1398/9/4 | انتشار: 1398/9/4

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA

بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به مجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گیلان می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Dentomaxillofacial

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb