جلد 7، شماره 4 - ( 9-1397 )                   جلد 7 شماره 4 صفحات 173-182 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tavangar S M, Mohammadi M, Tayefeh Davalloo R, Darabi F, Mirmasumi M. Comparing Microleakage Between Bulk-Fill Composites (Flowable, Packable) and Conventional Light-cured Composite in Class II Cavities. 3dj. 2018; 7 (4) :173-182
URL: http://3dj.gums.ac.ir/article-1-334-fa.html
Comparing Microleakage Between Bulk-Fill Composites (Flowable, Packable) and Conventional Light-cured Composite in Class II Cavities. مجله انگلیسی زبان دانشکده دندانپزشکی گیلان. 1397; 7 (4) :173-182

URL: http://3dj.gums.ac.ir/article-1-334-fa.html


چکیده:   (927 مشاهده)
Introduction: Compared to conventional composites, bulk-fill composites increase polymerization depth and contraction stress, and reduce cuspal deflection. Therefore, it is claimed that their microleakage is reduced. This study aimed to compare the microleakage of bulk-fill composites (flowable and packable) with conventional light-cured ones.
Materials and Methods: This in vitro experimental study was done on 60 human extracted premolars. We made standard Class II cavities (4 mm in height, 3 mm in length buccolingually, and 1.5 mm in axial depth) in the teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups based on the type of composite: group I consists of packable bulk-fill (x-tra fill packable; VOCO Company) composite, group II with flowable bulk-fill (x-tra base; VOCO Company), and group III with conventional composite (Grandio; VOCO Company). The total-etch bonding system (the 5th generation) was applied in all cavities. After restoration, the teeth were thermocycled. Finally, the microleakage rate was evaluated using a stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed using the Chi-square test (α=0.05) in SPSS.
Results: The results indicated no statistically significant difference between enamel and dentinal margins in bulk-fill packable and conventional composites (P=0.06). In the bulk-fill flowable group, dentinal margins had greater dye penetration to the enamel margin in the axial surface (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of marginal microleakage of enamel and dentin (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Using bulk-fill flowable composites on the dentinal cavity is not suitable with the thickness recommended by the manufacturer. To prove these results, we need to design and perform long-term in vitro and in vivo studies. The use of the incremental technique for placement of composites, even with the bulk-fill group sounds to be more logical.
متن کامل [PDF 1357 kb]   (1031 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: تخصصي
دریافت: 1396/12/26 | پذیرش: 1397/5/22 | انتشار: 1397/9/10

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به مجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گیلان می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2021 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Dentomaxillofacial

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb