[Home ]      
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Indexing & Abstracting::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: referees page ::

  In The Name of God

 

  Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Pathology and Surgery

 

  Reviewer Recommendation and Suggestions

 

  Manuscript Title:

 

 

 

  Manuscript Number:

 

 

 

  Reviewer (1, 2, 3):

 

 

 

  Please give the score from 1 to 5 (1=poor and 5=excellent) into the provided boxes:

 

  -Novelty of the manuscript 1   2   3   4   5

 

 

 

  -Significance of the submitted paper to the field of Dentistry  1   2   3   4   5

 

 

 

  -Association and relevancy to the field of journal  1   2  3   4   5

 

 

 

 

  -Proper English structure  1   2   3   4   5

 

 

 

 

  - No Repetition of previous research  1   2   3   4   5

 

 

 

 

  We suggest you copy and paste your comments into the provided section:

  -Confidential suggestion to editor (provide a recommendation about the manuscripts suitability for publication in the journal and other necessary suggestions)

 

 

 

 

 

  -Reviewer suggestion to author(s):

 

  *Title:

 

 

  *Abstract:

 

 

 

  *Introduction:

 

 

 

 

  *Materials and Methods:

 

 

 

 

 

 

  *Results:

 

 

 

 

 

  *Figures:

 

 

 

 

 

  *Tables

 

 

 

 

 

  *Discussion and conclusion:

 

 

 

 

 

  *Reference:

 

 

 

 

 

  *Overall suggestion:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Please provide answers to below specific questions:

 

 

  Title

  Is the title clear and concise? Yes    No  

 

  Abstract:

  Is the abstract satisfactory? Yes  No  

 

  Does it concern the purpose of the work and what was done and? Yes  No 

 

  Text

  Is the study design scientifically valid? Yes  No 

 

  Have all abbreviations been explained in the text? Yes  No 

 

  Were the methods sufficiently Novel? Yes  No  

 

  Were the findings sufficiently Novel? Yes  No  

 

  Do the results present the data properly? Yes   No  

 

  Does the discussion explain and discuss the results of the study? Yes   No  

 

  Is the conclusion satisfactory? Yes  No  

 

 

  Does the conclusion support the data? Yes  No 

 

  Is the length of paper appropriate? Yes  No 

 

  Was the text well-written? Yes  No 

 

  Reference

  Do the references follow the guidelines? Yes  No 

 

  Tables

  Are all the tables necessary? Yes  No 

 

  Can they be simplified or condensed? Yes  No 

 

  Dose the layout of the table has proper design? Yes  No 

 

  Is the data arranged properly? Yes  No 

 

  Is the legend of each table satisfactory? Yes  No 

 

  Figures:

  Are the number and quality of figures satisfactory? Yes  No 

 

  Do the legends explain the figures properly? Yes  No 

 

  Statistics:

  

  Is the correct statistical test used for data analysis? Yes  No 

 

  Ethical Concerns:

  Are there any ethical considerations? Yes  No 

 

  Were the studies performed in accordance whit the declaration of Helsinki? Yes   No 

 

  Recommendation:

  Accepted   

 

  Accepted with minor revision  

 

  Major revision required    

 

  Rejected   

View: 3185 Time(s)   |   Print: 249 Time(s)   |   Email: 16 Time(s)   |   0 Comment(s)
::
:: please see this page ::
papers

View: 3137 Time(s)   |   Print: 202 Time(s)   |   Email: 18 Time(s)   |   0 Comment(s)
::
مجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گیلان Journal of Dentomaxillofacial
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.135 seconds with 873 queries by yektaweb 3375