Volume 6, Issue 3 (Autumn 2017)                   3dj 2017, 6(3): 69-76 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


1- Assistant Professor, Dental Science Research Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
2- Assistant Professor, Dental Science Research Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. , dr.f.ostovarrad@gmail.com
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Anzali Faculty of Dentistry, International Branch, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
4- Dentist, Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Abstract:   (497 Views)
Introduction: Dental caries is one of the most common chronic diseases in the world. Dentists acquire the ability to correctly identify caries through training. In addition to clinical examination, the use of radiographic techniques, especially the bitewing technique, are the main tools for the accurate detection of caries. The present study was conducted to investigate the accuracy of senior students of Rasht Dental School in detecting proximal caries. 
Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, ten standard-quality bitewing radiographs (152 dental surfaces) were selected. The samples were then examined for the presence and depth of interproximal caries by 39 senior students (as observers) and five faculty members as the gold standard. The findings were analyzed using statistics including sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), accuracy, and kappa.
Results: The rate of agreement (kappa) between the students and the gold standard in detecting the presence and depth of caries was 0.696 and 0.502, respectively. The students’ reliability in the detection of caries and its depth yielded a kappa coefficient of 0.912 and 0.638, respectively.
Conclusion: The student’s accuracy in detecting caries was significantly good. Nonetheless, they had moderate accuracy in detecting the depth of caries, and they underestimated the depth especially in the case of caries at the DEJ level. The students’ reliability in detecting the presence of caries was almost excellent and their reliability for detecting the depth was significantly good, too.
Full-Text [PDF 671 kb]   (205 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (124 Views)  
Type of Study: Original article | Subject: So on
Received: 2017/02/10 | Accepted: 2017/06/5 | Published: 2017/10/1

References
1. Heymann HO, SwiftEJ, Ritter AV. Sturdenvant's Art & science of operative dentistry. 6th edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2013.
2. Hilton T, Ferracane JL, Broome JC. Summitt's fundamentals of operative dentistr. 4th edition. Berlin: Quintessence publishing; 2013.
3. Matalon S, Feuerstein O, Kaffe I. Diagnosis of approximal caries: Bite-wing radiology versus the Ultrasound Caries Detector. An in vitro study. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2003; 95(5):626–31. doi: 10.1067/moe.2003.164 [DOI:10.1067/moe.2003.164]
4. Young DA, Featherstone JD. Digital imaging fiber-optic trans-illumination, F-speed radiographic film and depth of approximal lesions. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2005; 136(12):1682-7. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0111 [DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0111]
5. Whaites E, Drage N. Essentials of dental radiography and radiology . 5th edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2013. [PMID]
6. Lewis DW, Kay EJ, Main PA, Pharoah MG, Csima A. Dentists' variability in restorative decisions, microscopic and radiographic caries depth. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 1996; 24(2):106-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00824.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00824.x]
7. Nikneshan S, Moradi AH, Mohseni S, Moshfeghi M. Capability of senior dental students in detecting the presence and diagnosing the depth of proximal caries on a bite wing radiographs. Journal of Dental School. 2012; 30(2):110-16.
8. Scarfe WC, Langlais RP, Nummikoski P, Dove SB, McDavid WD, Deahl ST, Yuan CH. Clinical comparison of two panoramic modalities and posterior bite-wing radiography in the detection of proximal dental caries. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1994; 77(2):195-207. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(94)90284-4 [DOI:10.1016/0030-4220(94)90284-4]
9. Kamburoğlu K, Kolsuz E, Murat S, Yüksel S, Özen T. Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2012; 41(6):450–9. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/30526171 [DOI:10.1259/dmfr/30526171]
10. Sabbagh S, Nikneshan S, Abbas F. Detection of proximal caries using digital radiographic systems with different resolutions. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2015; 26(1):5-10. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.156787 [DOI:10.4103/0970-9290.156787]
11. Mileman PA, van den Hout WB. Comparing the accuracy of Dutch dentists and dental students in the radiographic diagnosis of dentinal caries. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2002; 31(1):7–14. doi: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600652 [DOI:10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600652]
12. Romoozi E, Daneshkazemi AR, Tavana N. [Diagnostic value of senior dental students in Yazd about of detection the proximal caries on panoramic radiographs compared to detection of experts in 1394 (Persian)]. Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical sciences. 2016; 24(5):452-9.
13. Goodarzi Pour D, Nejati S, Fotouhi A. [Accuracy of digital panoramic regarding interproximal caries detection (Persian)]. Journal of Dental Medicine. 2011; 24(1):36-41.
14. Goodarzi Pour D, Bashizade H, Talaeipour AR, Najafi Motlagh A. [Evaluation of the accordance of panoramic radiography ordering in maxillofacial radiology department, school of dentistry, Tehran university of medical sciences with FDA guidelines in scholar year 2005-2006 (Persian)]. Journal of Dental Medicine. 2007; 20(3):220-6.
15. Falahzadeh F, Tayyebi A, Tofangchiha M, Modirfalah H, Khosroshahi SS. [Agreement of bitewing and digital panoramic radiographies in the detection of proximal caries (Persian)]. Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences. 2013; 20(4):343-53.
16. Abdinian M, Faghihian R, Faghihian H, Student D. [Proximal caries detection accuracy using intra oral digital bitewing radiography and conventional intra oral bitewing radiography with film (Persian)]. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 2014; 25(125):131-34.
17. Shirani F, Zamani Naser A, Mosavat F, Hamzeh M. [The sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of dental caries among senior dental students (Persian)]. Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques. 2011; 7(5):712-14.
18. Hekmatian E, Jalaie ES. [Assessment of the ability of senior dental students of esfahan university of medical sciences to detect interproximal caries on conventional bite wing radiographs (Persian)]. Journal of Isfahan Dental School. 2013; 9(3):266-72.
19. Espelid I, Tveit AB. Diagnostic quality and observer variation in radiographic diagnoses of approximal caries. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1986; 44(1):39–46. doi: 10.3109/00016358609041296 [DOI:10.3109/00016358609041296]
20. Diniz MB, Rodrigues JA, Neuhaus KW, Cordeiro RCL, Lussi A. Influence of examiner's clinical experience on the reproducibility and accuracy of radiographic examination in detecting occlusal caries. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2009; 14(5):515–23. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0323-z [DOI:10.1007/s00784-009-0323-z]
21. Yasar F, Akgunlu F, Apaydin B. Comparison of the observer agreements of the fourth and final year students in radiographic caries diagnosis. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2011; 20:51-58.
22. Hellén-Halme K, Petersson GH. Influence of education level and experience on detection of approximal caries in digital dental radiographs. An in vitro study. Swedish Dental Journal. 2010; 34(2):63-9. PMID: 20701214 [PMID]
23. Wenzel A, Hintze H, Kold LM, Kold S. Accuracy of computer‐automated caries detection in digital radiographs compared with human observers. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2002; 110(3):199-203. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.21245.x [DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.21245.x]
24. Wrbas KT, Kielbassa AM, Schulte-Monting J, Hellwig E. Effects of additional teaching of final-year dental students on their radiographic diagnosis of caries. European Journal of Dental Education. 2000; 4(3):138–42. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0579.2000.040309.x [DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0579.2000.040309.x]
25. Shams N, Panahandeh N, Aghababa H, Shams B, Hemati E. Effects of education and experience on detection of proximal caries on digital radiographs. Oral Radiology. 2015; 32(3):154-9. doi: 10.1007/s11282-015-0227-3 [DOI:10.1007/s11282-015-0227-3]
26. Maupome G, Sheiham A. Decisions on diagnosis and management of approximal caries by final-year dental students. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 1997; 26(2):107-11. doi: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600218 [DOI:10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600218]