Volume 2, Issue 2 (8-2013)                   3dj 2013, 2(2): 23-27 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ehsani M, Abesi F, Haghanifar S, Khafri S, Hamzeh M, Habibi A. Comparison of Radiopacity of Six Endodontic Sealers . 3dj. 2013; 2 (2) :23-27
URL: http://3dj.gums.ac.ir/article-1-46-en.html
1- Assistant professor Dental Material Research Center, Department of endodontics, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
2- Assistant professor Dental Material Research Center Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
3- Associate Professor Dental Material Research Center Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
4- Assistant Professor of Biostatistics Department of Social Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
5- Postgraduate Student of Pediatric Dentistry Dental Material Research Center Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
6- Dentist Dental Material Research Center
Abstract:   (2275 Views)
Introduction: Optimal radiopacity is one of the properties required for a root canal sealer that helps the distinction between the sealer and surrounding anatomic structures and evaluation of the quality of root filling. So, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiopacity of six root canal sealers at different focal distances. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, six endodontic sealers (ADSEAL, AH26, AH plus, Dorifill, MTA fillapex, and ZOE), were prepared and placed in a mold with 1mm thickness and 10mm diameter. The specimens were posi-tioned alongside an aluminum step wedge on a digital detector (occlusal size 76×57 mm). Radi-ographic imaging was performed at 15 and 30cm focal distances and radiopacity of each specimen was measured.One-way ANOVA and paired t-test were used and p<0.05 was consi-dered significant. Results: All sealers were found to be more radiopaque than 3 mm aluminum. At 15cm focal distance, the radiopacity values were 31.7, 60.68, 121.48, 52.4, 48.6, and 48.08 aluminum for ADSEAL, AH26, AH plus,Dorifill, MTA fillapex and ZOE, respectively. At 30cm focal distance, the figures were 80.32, 153.6, 253.6, 139.92, 144.08, and 129.92 for ADSEAL, AH26, AH plus,Dorifill, MTA fillapex and ZOE, respectively. Conclusion: All of the sealers investigated in this study met the standards for minimal radiopacity. AH plus had the highest radiopacity at both focal distances. Radiopacity decreased by increasing the focal distance and the decline was statistically significant for AHplus.
Full-Text [PDF 81 kb]   (836 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original article | Subject: Radiology
Received: 2013/11/17 | Accepted: 2013/11/17 | Published: 2013/11/17

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA code

© 2018 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Dentomaxillofacial

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb