Volume 9, Issue 1 (2-2020)                   3dj 2020, 9(1): 31-35 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Darabi F, Tavangar S M, Tayefeh Davalloo R, Ebrahimi M, khanderu H. Effect of saliva contamination and different decontamination procedures on micro leakage of composite restorations. 3dj. 2020; 9 (1) :31-35
URL: http://3dj.gums.ac.ir/article-1-382-en.html
1- Associate professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental Sciences Research Center, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
2- Dentist
3- Post-graduate student, Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental Sciences Research Center, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
Abstract:   (398 Views)
Introduction: A few studies have investigated the effect of saliva contamination of cured or uncured adhesive systems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of salivary contamination and different decontamination methods on microleakage of composite restorations. 
Materials and Methods: Class V cavities (2 mm wide, 1.5 mm deep, and 4 mm long) were prepared on buccal and lingual surfaces of 135 extracted human premolars. The specimens were randomly divided into 9 groups, 30 cavities in each. The materials used consisted of single bond (3M) and Z250 (3M). Except group 1 (Control), in Groups 2-5, uncured adhesive, and in groups 6-9 cured adhesive was contaminated with saliva (30 s). Decontaminating procedures were: blot-drying, rebonding (Groups 3 and 6), rinsing, air-drying, rebonding (Groups 4 and 7), rinsing, blot-drying, rebonding (Groups 8 and5). In groups 2and 9 no decontamination procedure was done. After restoring the cavities, thermo-cycling and dye penetration, they were sectioned buccolingually and analyzed by stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (P<0.05).
Results: In occlusal margins; there were no significant differences in the microleakage between groups 3,4,5 with group 1(P>0.05) but in gingival margin, there were significant differences in the microleakage between all of the groups with group1(P= 0.0001).
Conclusion: None of the methods in this study could reduce the micro leakage in the cavities with both enamel and dentin margins.
 
Full-Text [PDF 452 kb]   (90 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original article | Subject: So on
Received: 2020/06/28 | Accepted: 2020/06/28 | Published: 2020/06/28

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Dentomaxillofacial

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb